About Me

"Use every man after his desert, and who should 'scape whipping?"

Monday, 11 May 2015

Paradise Lost: another little bit of Brixton's cultural heritage is demolished

No more rus in urge, though apparently this garden was based on a bit of Brockwell Park…but who will the new homes be for?
This small detail from the Mauleverer Road mural was
 still visible today (11 May 2015): but if you want to see
any of it you have to move fast,  as the demolition
seems to be starting up again.
For the last few weeks, locals  and visitors to Mauleverer Road in Brixton have been faced with a sorry sight: one the area's  biggest and best known murals, showing scenes from local history, has been half-demolished.

You almost wish someone would finish of this dirty job, and put the much-loved painting out of its misery.

The Mauleverer Road mural was painted by a group of artists in the early 1980s, and it has already survived one demolition attempt, thanks to prompt local campaigning. The story of its creation,  and its role in the local community, is told in detail on the excellent London Mural Preservation Society website.

This time, however, it seems the luck has run out. Demolition began back in April but for whatever reason, it seems the builders are stretching it out , removing one layer or two layers of brick every week or so.

The last time I dared to look (on Monday 11 May) the main wall was cut down to less than half its original height, so that most of the woodland scenes a had gone, as well as half the formal garden (above right) and half the Caribbean beach scene. The horses in their stables were still intact and apparently they might be spared, as this part of the outer wall is to be retained - or so I heard.

But even if they are, the integrity of this great work with its many hidden jokes and references, will be lost forever. To those who love this mural, myself included, this seems like a form of torture, or at least of unmitigated cruelty to works of community art. Why is this happening?


As so often with these community murals - many of which were created in the heady years of peak squatting and resistance to the the Thatcher government - the painting came as a complete surprise to any visitors to this otherwise quiet,  unremarkable street, a few blocks south of Acre Lane. It covers one of the huge brick walls of the old Tuborg brewery, which had a frontage on Mandrell Road and which closed, according to another blog (Painted Signs and Mosaics), over 30 years ago. This brewery had clearly occupied old carrier's stables, hence the horses and stable doors at the western end of the mural (these are still intact)*.

Discussion on the Brixton Buzz blog  forum reveals that he building was later used as a distribution depot for the yuppie clothing retailer The White Stuff, but that too has moved away. The whole building now looks set to be turned into apartments. Let's hope they are at least as visually pleasing and imaginative and become as much loved by the local community as the artwork they are replacing (opens sick bag, turns away).

Here are a few more pics of what we are losing:


Artists signed their names on the punch and Judy stall
Wgen they finished the mural in 1983, the artists - Jane Gifford,
Mick Harrison,  Caroline Thorp, Ruth Blench - added their
signatures to the Punch and Judy stall






The massive Mauleverer Road Mural in Brixton, is being destroyed to make way for new flats
The painted horses in their stables reflect the original use of this building - even before it was a brewery, there were stables here for carrier horses and donkeys serving all of London and its suburbs.


* Sad footnote - as of 19.05.15 it looks like the horses and stable doors are going to go as well - a glimpse of what's left of the mural last night suggested the whole length of the wall has now been levelled down to about 2m above pavement height.




Wednesday, 6 May 2015

Property jackals murdering the gay soul of London

There's a massive crime wave hitting London, and the chances are it's happening in a street near you.

All over the city, popular, cheap, accessible centres of community are being snuffed out, suffocated by rising rents and aggressive property speculators. Each day comes news of a new outrage. Last week, for example, we heard that the The Black Cap pub in Camden High Street is to close because the owners of the property want to convert the upper floors into luxury flats.

A little later that day - in that sort of newsroom coincidence that makes you want to scream out loud, what the fuck is going on?– we heard that campaigners are now having to fight to save the Royal Vauxhall Tavern, which would - if anyone asked you - probably be the second LGBT pub you'd name after the great centre of all things drag in Camden Town.

I have fond memories of the Black Cap, spending a few evenings there with my dear friend Phil as she make her first steps into the lesbian world. I've never been inside the RVT but always enjoyed seeing the clientele milling around outside in minimal clothing of a summer Sunday evening as I made my grim way back from Cambridge.

In case you think they're picking on gays - well, probably not, but - who knows? Madam Jo-Jos in SOho has already gone the way of all lovely, anarchic, scruffy centres of joyous everything, to be replaced by wtf hideously expensive flats, god knows.

The sort of property developer we all suspect is doing these things is certainly the type who wants to attract clients who will not be best pleased by all-night partying, loud music and noisy, boisterous clientele emerging from the premises at 4 or 5 am in full voice.

To which the only possible riposte is, if you don't like noisy parties and antisocial behaviour, don't move into any of  London's party districts. Instead, just buy a flat in a docklands high-rise or go to your natural habitat, the Surrey-through-Berks-through-Bucks stockbroker belt.

Early and sustained resistance worked at the Elephant and Castle, where the Ministry of Sound managed to overturn a planning consent for luxury flats close enough for the exhausted traders living there (if anyone would have actually lived there) might be kept wake by the booming bass of the dance floor.

But elsewhere pub after club after music venue has gone dark  - whether in Soho, or Brixton, or Islington, they're all falling away. New Cross and Dalston and Deptford will be next, you can be sure.
Another place fighting for its survival is the beautiful community arts centre in Shoreditch, the Rich Mix, which is apparently losing its council funding. If that happens - and there's every sign a massive campaign will fight this one to the bitter end - then it takes little imagination to work out who the land will go to.

Similar developers are even planning the destruction of the very heart of London's music business, Denmark Streeet.

If, when that happens - and heaven knows what ghastly tribute to the  music industry heritage they are planning to knock up there to keep the council happy - then we'll know it really is all over, won't we?



Wednesday, 22 April 2015

Formula E car racing for Battersea Park - but why not send it to SE19?

Attempting to cycle through Battersea Park a week or two back, was puzzled to find way impeded by huge teams of men and machines resurfacing the wide road that rings the park.

They were going at it with such vigour, and with such precision, that it made one wonder: why here, on this park road, which is banned to normal traffic and is perfectly adequate for the runners and cyclists and skaters who normally use it. Surely there were plenty of potholed roads in the borough of Wandsworth  that were  much more in need of re-surfacing?
Peace of Battersea Park to be shattered by high speed electric racing cars
This wide, verdant road circling Battersea
 Park is soon to host some much speedier
 action. Come June, the runners, skaters and
 cyclists who flock here will be ousted by
 140mph Formula E electric racing cars

A letter in the Evening Standard brought sudden enlightenment: Wandsworth council has given permission for the PArk to be used for the finals of the Formula E Motor racing season, at the end of June 2015.

The letter-writer was complaining about the impact on  local residents and park users, as well as London's pollution levels.

I immediately prepared myself to go into full righteous indignation and anger mode: how dare this Tory council yet again put the interests of its corporate buddies above those of its own  residents, and the environment of a large area of south west London?

Psyching myself up to unleash a verbal onslaught on the petrol heads of Wandsworth,  I looked up Formula E and felt a bit stupid. This (as you will probably know or  have guessed) is a sort of Formula 1 but for cars powered by electricity.

So there you go - Wandsworth is backing an initiative which should raise the profile of "green" electric vehicles, and pocketing a fair wad of cash at the same time.

But again, it's not so simple. As the letter writer pointed out, the big race will involve hundreds of (non-electric-powered) trucks, vans and cars making thousands of journeys into and out of the park to prepare the circuit and the viewing areas.

The park itself will be closed to the public for at least two full days.

On race day, there will be 30,000 spectators making their way to the park along roads already badly overused and compromised by all the roadworks contingent on the Nine Elms  re-development.

Locals who love this park are already used to finding it wholly or partly closed down for various events. Several big city financial organisations book the whole park for their summer sports days and running events; large tracts of the park are often closed off for film companies. Each year the whole park is sealed off to all except ticket holders for the big firework display.

So, nothing new, but just another, even more annoying thing for those of us who simply want to stroll through this lovely peoples' park without the risk of being flattened by a 140mph electric racing car.  And what about the Buddhist monks and devotees trying to make their way to the Peace Pagoda on the north side of the park? Presumably they don't make the wailing noise of their petrol-fuelled brothers. The race is scheduled for 27 or 28 June, potentially one of the best weekends of the summer.

WHy not revive Crystal Palace race-track for FormulaE instead of Battersea Park?
Back in the 60s, world-famous GP drivers used
 to thunder past the remains of Crystal Palace
 and the BBC TV transmitter. Why not
restore this track for Formula E?
Also - I wonder if the Formula E People considered holding the race at  another south London location, more given to sports of all types and in dire need of revival? I mean Crystal Palace, which still has a twisty little racing track that up until the mid-1960s was a regular location for all types of car and motor cycle racing events. It must be about the same size as the Battersea PArk track, but it has the advantage of going around a large and distinctly under-used National Sports Centre, which would not be disrupted by such an event as it has full access via bridges. It's actually a better, more scenic track, specifically designed for this sort of sport, and it is not (as is the case at Battersea) almost entirely lined by avenues of mature plane trees.

As a kid I was often taken there by my sister and her successive boyfriends; I remember clearly seeking all the stars of the era (Jim Clark, Graham Hill, Bruce McLaren, amongst others) throwing what looked like family saloons around this cute little track at unbelievable speeds. Then they did the same thing even faster in their formula 2 Lotuses and Coopers.

That track certainly would need re-surfacing and probably widening as well - but given the collapse of the latest Crystal Palace regeneration proposals, surely this could have been an opportunity to revive the fast-disintegrating facilities of this famous site?

Monday, 20 April 2015

Kate Hoey MP attacks "shocking" Nine Elms development

A new reason to be grateful to live in the constituency held by Kate Hoey, an old-school Labour MP with some oddball ideas but her heart in the right place.

The constituency is called Vauxhall but it takes in a long thin slice of north and west Lambeth, including all of Stockwell and Clapham Town, most of Brixton and the mysteriously-named Vassall ward.

At an outdoor hustings in Kennington last weekend, Ms Hoey spoke out against the monstrous development of luxury housing alongside the river between Chelsea Bridge and Vauxhall, the development I have (yawn) very tediously tried to rebrand as Nine Elms Disease.

Interestingly, it seems most of this development is actually just outside her constituency, as the Vauxhall boundary (according to the OS constituencies map) runs more or less along the Wandsworth Road as far as Queenstown Road, then heads up Cedars Road to the north side of Clapham Common.

But in all other senses this development will have - is already having - a massive and baleful impact on
her constituencies. It's not just the transport and infrastructure pressure that all those new rich people's homes with their SUVs in their underground car parks will create on the surrounding streets, not the visual pollution already hideously apparent from the lego-style apartment blocks going up along the river front. You also have to look at the damage done to roads by the constant stream of tipper trucks on all the surrounding trunk roads for a start. Or, try breathing as you cycle up past Battersea Park on a windy day, and fill your lungs with acrid dust.

Ms Hoey kept her words short but to the point:

"I think what has happened along the South Bank and along Vauxhall has been shocking...We have lost out on so much value of that land. It has not gone into affordable housing but private developers."


Hear, hear, Kate! Good on you. So what will you do about it?

"I want to see a top band of council tax brought in for all those multi million developments along the river."

Yeah well, so do we all, it might help a bit.

Maybe you wonder why Kate hasn't made a bit more noise about this before now? Well, she had, but MPs have no role in planning decisions, and anyway, as already pointed out, the majority of the land is in the neighbouring Battersea constituency.

And what about some more drastic legislative action at a national level to remove planning consent powers from individual local authorities for schemes  which are so massive they will disrupt the lives of residents in all the surrounding boroughs as well?

The apologists for this development continue to extol the virtues of a new tube extension - to the Northern Line of all over-crowded lines, for god's sake! And the linear park, which in architects drawings looks like something out of a very scary video game. You can almost imagine the poor and the beggars and the scruffy kids clambering up the walls and fences to gawp at the rich within, and to dodge the plastic bullets and tasters of the private security guards….

Ok, a maybe not too distant fantasy… which in part could depend a bit on who one votes for next month. If I hadn't already decided, this latest speech would have reminded me there's really only one option.





Monday, 30 March 2015

Why being a voluntary worker in London in 2015 can suck (big time)

I've done over 1,000 hours of voluntary work in the past two years, and while I enjoyed much of it, and learned a lot, there's also a little bit of a lingering sour taste. I feel I have had my face dipped into the soup-kitchen tureen of Mr D Cameron's "big society" and to be honest I have to say there's a bad aftertaste. There's something rancid in it.

Of course, it's probably me. Everyone said that after redundancy and all the attendant loss of self-confidence and self-esteem, etc, volunteering was a great way of rebuilding yourself. They didn't tell me it could also be the precise opposite.

I took the volunteer plunge early in 2012, striding into a local charity shop I visited quite regularly, and offered my services. I went through various interview and vetting stages, and started work in a delightful branch in a rather villagey area of SW4.

It was this charity shop chain that gave me both the best and worst of times.


I loved much of my time at the various branches of this well-known chain of shops. I have had a long love affair with charity shops as a buyer of clothes and books and records, and as my former career as a writer seemed to draw to a natural  conclusion, it seemed fitting that I should give something back to the movement that had given me so much pleasure, over the decades.

The first few weeks were great fun. I learned a great deal about retail, and what a difficult and exhausting job it could be. It was a real a revelation being on the other side of the counter, seeing how the experienced staff (in particular, the excellent manager, M) dealt with the weird donations and the tricky customers. I was astonished by the dedication and commitment of both manager and volunteers.


I made it clear early on I was a book and music lover, so she handed all that side of the shop over to me. There were lots of other volunteers, though M relied mainly on a core of three or four staunch  regulars, and she made it clear she hoped I would become another of these. There were also often young foreign students on short-term work-experience. Generally we all took turns working the till, cleaning, ragging the useless stuff, re-stocking shelves, etc.

As time went on, my manager was moved to a more prestigious branch of the charity, and I went with her. I would spend at least two or three mornings or afternoons each week at this shop, which was based in a very smart area of west London. That shop, like my first branch,  had just been refurbished, and we were all called in to prepare for the re-opening - a great deal of heavy lifting and sorting, heaving boxes and sacks and bits of display furniture into and out of the charity's all purpose white van.

As the months went by I watched with admiration as M concocted beautiful and inviting window-displays from carefully selected donations - a crazy sequinned ball-gown, hats, masks, gloves, old paintings  African carvings, Musical instruments, battered leather  luggage, motorcycle goggles, old magazines and maps, decorative lamps, bakelite radio sets….

Every week, a new window. She would collect items for certain obvious weeks - Halloween or Valentines, Easter, Quattorze Juillet were the obvious ones in that street. Being a wealthy and  cosmopolitan area that had not quite lost its bohemian fringe, the quality and eccentricity of donations was often a delight. Mind you that did not stop people handing in huge sacks of soiled children's clothes and broken toys and stinky old sports gear.

I quickly realised that charity shops, apart from their many other great uses, were also a vital link in the  support chain for those fragile souls who had been cast out into the world by the previous decade's "care in the community" policy. We would often spend half hours, full hours, entertaining excitable young and not so young souls, who would want to try on every dress on the rail because they had been invited to the Ivy by a splendid Iranian prince. And so on...

We also had a lot of traffic from tourists visiting the big museums up the road, as well as - on - occasion - some of their staff. Antique experts, gallery curators, self-proclaimed experts, Portobello Road dealers, well-heeled amamteurs, they all made regular visits, some on the way back from an auction at nearby Bonham's, or was it Christies?

There were one or two distinctly unpleasant characters, ordering us to get items out of display cases, spending ages scrutinising them with their eye-pieces, then handing back with a sneer. "Paste". "Rubbish". "You're overcharging criminally for that".

And then there were the shoplifting families.

Anyway, it was all great fun. Except, of course, when the inevitable politics of the workplace came into play. I took an instant dislike to the head office crew who would swan around the many shops they ran, bossing staff and volunteers around like they were their personal servants.

Their management style was not the iron fist in the velvet glove. It was usually just the iron fist, with lashings of sharp tongue as well.

Inevitably, they used the divide and rule tactic ruthlessly. There was incessant gossiping  amongst managers and volunteers, some of whom had worked there for many years and in many different shops.

It was difficult not to get involved in all this, and rather foolishly I accepted a paid part-time job at the charity. I loved the work, although it was very demanding, at least physically and the pay was derisory. For much of the time I enjoyed the company, at least the younger members of the team - but it got to the point where I fell into disfavour.

The paid work came to an abrupt halt, but I was happy to carry on as a volunteer.  This did not accord with the charity's policy. One day I went in and was told by an almost tearful M that I was no longer to be a volunteer there. Well, there you go, so I went.

I have such good memories - especially of the other volunteers. I've written about some of this elsewhere. But I also now have that strange, nagging feeling that I offered as much as I could but was rejected: not even a charity shop wanted your services.

The next voluntary work I got was with a very busy community centre in Brixton, helping to give English lessons and conversation classes to groups of immigrants. I was amazed by the commitment of the other volunteers here. A few were clearly of retirement age and perhaps did not need the income, but the place was run by a team of very young, energetic community activists, and their enthusiasm set the tone for everyone else.

Most of the students were delightful; typically they would be working as cleaners all the hours they could get, and would often turn up late and exhausted, and yet they still made huge efforts to learn.

This was a great place and I felt privileged to be allowed to work there - I did have some teaching experience but not in the ESOL/TEFL area, and again I had to learn from the more experienced volunteers, who were endlessly patient with me.

I worked hard to get my lessons right, and sometimes they seemed to work (I now realise they were hopelessly ambitious). And yet, quite soon the slob in me felt threatened. It seems in all these organisations there's an undertow pulling at the feet of volunteers, wanting them to give more and more time. I felt that this organisation was doing so much excellent work - particularly its youth activities - that it should really not be so heavily reliant on volunteer who tenede to be either very young (students clocking up experience) or antiquated people like me at the dog-end of their working lives.

I would love to be volunteering now, but I am reluctant to risk  it again: I will either not be good enough, or if I am good, they will want to devour me, they will make me feel guilty at not giving more and more of my time. We live in this ridiculous city where unimaginably rich people occupy the best properties,  eat at the best restaurants in the world, and rely on immigrants to clean their houses and offices, look after their children, cook their food and wash up their coffee cups. These immigrants are taught English by unemployed teachers doing their voluntary hours, and they buy their clothes from charity shops run by out-of-work journalists. And so it goes on. It's all just too funny for words…

Anyway, just thought it might add soothing to some debate. I threw myself into volunteering at the age of 60, when it seemed the world of full-time employment had taken a quick look at my cv and laughed itself sick at my presumption that I might still be eligible for some sort of  reasonably-paid employment (by reasonably I mean anything above the £12k pa pro rata I was getting from the charity job). Anything over £20k would seem marvellous.

So, having thrown myself into that world, I have, two years later, emerged shivering in the cold of the London employment climate right now. Loads of jobs for tough bright young things willing to do and say anything to get a job, even a minimum wages. Not much for old geezers who are not terribly good at boasting about their genius.

And especially not  old geezers who've had the last few grams of their confidence knocked out of them by pushy managers of voluntary organisations.









Saturday, 21 March 2015

Losing the will to live (in London)

Fire rips through the roof of Battersea Arts Centre's great hall, Friday 13th 2015

Sitting here, trying to write, a week ago, feeling glum as the bleakest and longest winter in living memory drags on, look out window, and see a huge pall of billowing, dark grey smoke rising from the middle distance, with an angry snake pit of snapping flames at its roots.

It's a serious fire, and it takes little time to work out where it's coming from - behind that church on Lavender Hill, it can only be the Battersea Arts Centre. No, surely I can't be - the place is so well loved, such a big part in so many lives, it is such a rare jewel in this godforsaken borough - it can't be BAC, can it, please?

Soon our worst fears are confirmed on news websites.

Heart plummets even further - and uncharitable thoughts rise. Why, with all these revolting new luxury apartment blocks going up in this area, why when there are so many hideous, ugly, lousy buildings in this area, does the fire have to choose this one last true beacon of democratic culture, art for all of us, high art, low art, entertainment, yoga -  in the whole of south west London?

Drawn like a sad moth to the flames, by bicycle, this sorry individual cranks up Lavender Hill, which  is still open at this stage though the cops are desperately trying to shoo cars through side streets. Half a dozen fire engines are there, the pavements around are packed with people, not the gawkers so much as people who have perhaps just been evacuated from BAC and neighbouring buildings, many clearly in a state of shock. Some are crying, others wandering around with that terrible look on their faces - grief.

That great angry tangle of flames was so shocking - like seeing some ferocious wild animal stalking prey in the south London suburban streets, a terrifying force, blind greed of those licking  flames. It was amazing to see how much water the LFB can get onto a high roof in such a short time, the thick plume of dark gray smoke lightens as steam replaces the burning wood smoke.

Here, now, a week later we know this story had a relatively happy ending. The brilliant LFB caught the blaze in time, so that only the grand hall is ruined - it is now roofless. But the front two-thirds of BAC is fine and open, and they're busily trying to raise more money…..


Thursday, 19 March 2015

A little glimpse of paradise on the Wandsworth Road

As so often seems to happen, I switch on the radio and hear, within seconds, someone talking about something that has been cooking away at the back of my mind for years.

As so often seems to happen, I switch on the radio and hear, within seconds, someone talking about something that has been cooking away at the back of my mind for years. Usually it's on BBC Radio London, and even more usually it's on the Robert Elms SHow. As indeed was the case today.

Today, it was hearing someone from the National Trust  talking about an amazing house interior, created entirely by one man in his spare time from a busy job in the Civil Service. I immediately thought they had to be discussing 575 Wandsworth Road - a house I have walked past thousands of times - and which is now owned by the National Trust and is also about to open to the public after years of restoration.

This NT person mentioned a free lecture on the topic to be held later the same day in Twickenham Public Library. Oddly enough, for someone spending more than half his life in SW LOndon, I'd never been to Twickenham town centre before (well I have been through it, but never to it). That day, I was there within  an hour, thanks to SW Trains.

It was an excellent lecture by the NT's conservationists, who helped to bring the house back to life with her discussion of the owner and creator of this place, Khadambi Asalache. Mr Asalache came to London in the 1960s as a student. His multiple talents - poet, novelist, mathematician, philosopher - flowered in the fertile climate of that age, even while he was holding down a full-time day job in the Treasury.

She added that he first spotted the house when travelling to work on the 77 bus - a route that we all know only too well, and still love, even though it's now the 87.

Next day, I more or less run down the road to scope the place out. There's nothing outside to give the slightest clue of the treasures within, nor even a hint the tit's a National Trust property. The place is so fragile that the trust is having to limit visitors, and advance booking is essential. But what a place it is,  to enter the house is to enter one man's dream, a secret dream world of East African artistry, heavily influenced by both indigenous art from Kenya but also the Islamic art of North Africa and Spain, the art of Granada.

He needed a place nearer the office. He bought the house in 1983, and began decorating it to his taste - but persistent damp in the cellar led him to line the walls with fretwork panels which now characterise the whole place. It's a fretwork Alhambra, built in a tiny Victorian terrace on an unglamorous stretch of an unglamorous south London trunk route, and it is magical.

Visit!

Great to hear the NT has employed a musician in residence this year - check out the programme of events on the NT's 575 Wandsworth Road website.